Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Sega"
From Game Developer Research Institute
(→AM2 games?) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:No, it didn't. For example, Rutubo Games did Sega Ages: After Burner II and Out Run. [[User:CRV|CRV]] 05:59, 23 February 2007 (CST) | :No, it didn't. For example, Rutubo Games did Sega Ages: After Burner II and Out Run. [[User:CRV|CRV]] 05:59, 23 February 2007 (CST) | ||
::Indeed Rutubo did. Those Wikipedia lists should be treated with utmost suspicion. | ::Indeed Rutubo did. Those Wikipedia lists should be treated with utmost suspicion. | ||
| + | I'm doubting "4th R&D" was AM4. On Moby, it says it didn't get into software until the 90's. Also, I'm not sure if Sega of America itself did any development, though there were certainly plenty of American divisions. Spider-Man was done by Recreational Brainware (later Headgames). [[User:CRV|CRV]] 05:27, 24 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 11:27, 24 February 2007
AM2 games?
This list looks highly suspect. Did AM2 really make these ugly or unremarkable ports of home games?
- No, it didn't. For example, Rutubo Games did Sega Ages: After Burner II and Out Run. CRV 05:59, 23 February 2007 (CST)
- Indeed Rutubo did. Those Wikipedia lists should be treated with utmost suspicion.
I'm doubting "4th R&D" was AM4. On Moby, it says it didn't get into software until the 90's. Also, I'm not sure if Sega of America itself did any development, though there were certainly plenty of American divisions. Spider-Man was done by Recreational Brainware (later Headgames). CRV 05:27, 24 February 2007 (CST)
